Let me be perfectly clear about something that has troubled me throughout my six decades in the law: our legal system has become a gated community where only the wealthy can afford adequate representation. This is not just morally reprehensible—it’s a constitutional crisis hiding in plain sight. But today, I want to discuss something that gives me genuine hope: artificial intelligence and legaltech innovations that can finally democratize access to justice.
The Constitutional Imperative for Legal Access
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel, but what good is that guarantee when most Americans cannot afford a lawyer for civil matters? We have created a two-tiered system of justice—one for those who can pay, and another for everyone else. This is precisely the kind of systemic inequality our Constitution was designed to prevent.
I have seen brilliant legal minds reduced to representing only the privileged few, while ordinary citizens navigate complex legal waters without a compass. This is not just inefficient—it’s a betrayal of our democratic principles. The law should not be a luxury good available only to those who can afford premium prices.
AI as the Great Equalizer in Legal Services
Here’s where artificial intelligence becomes not just useful, but essential to preserving the rule of law itself. Legal informatics—the systematic application of data science to legal practice—offers us tools that can provide sophisticated legal analysis at a fraction of traditional costs. This isn’t about replacing lawyers; it’s about extending legal expertise to those who have been systematically excluded from our justice system.
Consider the power of AI-driven contract analysis. A small business owner who cannot afford $500 per hour for contract review can now use AI tools that analyze agreements with the same attention to detail as a senior associate at a white-shoe firm. This is revolutionary—and it’s happening right now.
Document review, legal research, and basic legal drafting—tasks that have historically consumed enormous billable hours—can now be performed by AI systems with increasing accuracy. What once required teams of junior lawyers working around the clock can now be accomplished by intelligent systems that never sleep, never make careless errors due to fatigue, and cost pennies on the dollar.
Programmatic SEO: Making Legal Knowledge Discoverable
One of the most insidious barriers to legal access has been the opacity of legal information itself. Legal knowledge has been hoarded like trade secrets, accessible only to those initiated into the profession’s mysteries. Programmatic SEO changes this dynamic fundamentally.
When legaltech companies create comprehensive, searchable databases of legal information—covering everything from tenant rights in specific jurisdictions to immigration procedures for particular circumstances—they are performing a public service that rivals the work of legal aid societies. They are making the law accessible to those who need it most.
A single mother facing eviction in Detroit should not have to choose between paying rent and consulting a lawyer about her rights. Programmatic SEO ensures that accurate, jurisdiction-specific legal information appears when she searches for help. This is democratization in action.
Breaking Down the Barriers to Justice
The traditional model of legal practice—with its emphasis on billable hours, expensive downtown offices, and exclusivity—has created artificial scarcity in legal services. AI tools obliterate this scarcity. They can provide legal guidance 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without the overhead costs that make traditional legal services prohibitively expensive.
Consider the immigrant family trying to understand their rights during a workplace dispute, or the elderly person facing insurance claim denials. These are not abstract policy questions—these are real people facing real legal problems who have been priced out of the justice system. AI-powered legal tools can provide them with sophisticated analysis that was previously available only to corporate clients.
The Ethical Imperative of Technological Adoption
Some of my colleagues in the legal profession resist these innovations, claiming they somehow cheapen or diminish the practice of law. This is not just wrong—it’s morally bankrupt. When technology can provide better legal outcomes for more people at lower costs, opposing that technology is tantamount to defending inequality itself.
The legal profession has a ethical obligation to embrace tools that expand access to justice. We are officers of the court, sworn to uphold not just the law, but the principles of fairness and equality that underlie our entire system. Artificial intelligence in legal services is not a threat to these principles—it’s their logical extension into the digital age.
Legal Informatics and Evidence-Based Practice
Legal informatics offers us something we have never had before: the ability to practice law based on comprehensive data analysis rather than intuition and tradition. AI systems can analyze thousands of similar cases, identify patterns in judicial decision-making, and provide insights that improve legal outcomes for everyone.
This is particularly crucial for consumers who cannot afford extensive legal research. An AI system can instantly analyze how judges in specific jurisdictions have ruled on similar cases, what arguments have been most persuasive, and what strategies are most likely to succeed. This levels the playing field in ways that were unimaginable just a few years ago.
The Path Forward: Technology in Service of Justice
The future of legal services lies not in preserving the exclusivity of legal expertise, but in democratizing it through intelligent technology. AI tools that can draft basic legal documents, analyze contracts, research legal precedents, and provide strategic guidance represent the most significant expansion of access to justice since the establishment of public defender systems.
We must be vigilant about ensuring these tools maintain the highest standards of accuracy and ethical practice. But we must not let perfect become the enemy of good. Even imperfect AI legal assistance is often superior to no legal assistance at all—which is exactly what millions of Americans currently face.
The question is not whether artificial intelligence will transform legal services—it already has. The question is whether we will harness this transformation to create a more just and equitable legal system, or whether we will allow technological innovation to further entrench existing inequalities.
I believe we have a moral obligation to choose justice. The tools are here. The technology exists. What we need now is the will to use these innovations not just to make legal practice more profitable, but to make justice more accessible to all Americans. That is not just a business opportunity—it is a constitutional imperative.